Skip to main content

Table 4 Contingency tables and logistic regression results for the stakeholder group association with response rates

From: The use of a modified Delphi approach to engage stakeholders in zoonotic disease research priority setting

Rounds and stakeholder groups

Response

     
 

Yes

No

b

SE (b)

Odds ratio

95% CI

p-value a

Round 1

      

<0.001

 Policy developers/implementers

33

29

0.00

-

1.00

-

-

 Horse industry representatives

25

99

-1.51

0.34

0.22

0.11, 0.43

-

 Researchers

26

8

1.05

0.48

2.86

1.16, 7.65

-

 Horse health care providers

9

11

-0.33

0.52

0.72

0.26, 1.98

-

 Wildlife health managers

8

7

0.0043

0.58

1.00

0.32, 3.19

-

Round 2

      

0.034

 Policy developers/implementers

27

6

0.00

-

1.00

-

-

 Horse industry representatives

11

14

-1.75

0.61

0.18

0.050, 0.55

-

 Researchers

19

7

-0.51

0.63

0.60

0.17, 2.09

-

 Horse health care providers

5

4

-1.28

0.81

0.28

0.055, 1.40

-

 Wildlife health managers

6

2

-0.41

0.93

0.67

0.12, 5.30

-

Overall

      

<0.001

 Policy developers/implementers

27

35

0.00

-

1.00

-

 

 Horse industry representatives

11

113

-2.07

0.41

0.13

0.055, 0.27

 

 Researchers

19

15

0.50

0.43

1.64

0.71, 3.86

 

 Horse health care providers

5

15

-0.84

0.58

0.43

0.13, 1.27

 

 Wildlife health managers

6

9

-0.15

0.59

0.86

0.26, 2.70

 
  1. a p-values based on likelihood ratio Chi-square test of significance.