Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear hierarchical regression of respondent’s cleaning on RANAS and social dilemma variables

From: Shared toilet users’ collective cleaning and determinant factors in Kampala slums, Uganda

Factor blocks

Variables

Unstandardized coefficients

Standardized coefficients

t

Sig.

  

B

Std. error

Beta

  
 

Step 1

 

(Constant)

.390

.440

 

.886

.38

Risk factors

Vulnerability to get disease

.052

.080

.017

.656

.51

Severity of disease

-.060

.084

-.019

-.710

.48

Attitude factors

Affective feeling - cleaning shared toilet

-.059

.015

-.126

−3.998

.00

Instrumental - cleaning time consuming

.071

.047

.055

1.511

.13

Instrumental - cleaning effort

.039

.040

.035

.976

.33

Norm factors

Injunctive - approval to clean

.015

.020

.023

.740

.46

Injunctive - social pressure to clean

.017

.026

.018

.657

.51

Ability factors

Self-efficacy - cleaning difficulty

-.006

.034

-.007

-.178

.86

Self-efficacy - cleaning schedule

-.064

.029

-.063

−2.239

.03

Self-regulation factors

Action planning - cleaning daily routine

.505

.048

.521

10.538

.00

Remembering to clean

.139

.049

.115

2.825

.01

Cleaning commitment

.287

.052

.287

5.505

.00

 

Step 2

 

(Constant)

.331

.451

 

.735

.46

Risk factors

Vulnerability to get disease

.031

.079

.010

.398

.69

Severity of disease

.023

.084

.007

.269

.79

Attitude factors

Affective feeling - cleaning shared toilet

-.060

.015

-.129

−4.055

.00

Instrumental - cleaning time consuming

.076

.047

.058

1.610

.11

Instrumental - cleaning effortful

.048

.040

.043

1.205

.23

Norm factors

Injunctive - approval to clean

.012

.020

.017

.576

.57

Injunctive - social pressure to clean

-.003

.026

-.004

-.133

.89

Ability factors

Self-efficacy - cleaning difficulty

-.026

.036

-.028

-.713

.48

Self-efficacy - cleaning schedule

-.069

.029

-.068

−2.346

.02

Self-regulation factors

Action planning - cleaning daily routine

.405

.051

.419

7.937

.00

Remembering to clean

.118

.049

.097

2.410

.02

Cleaning commitment

.237

.053

.237

4.462

.00

Social motive factor

Respondents cleaning more than other users

.091

.021

.146

4.247

.00

Communication factors

Talking frequency

.007

.035

.005

.191

.85

Talking ease

.030

.033

.032

.903

.37

Perceived efficacy factors

Shared toilet users’ cleaning cooperation

.042

.036

.043

1.169

.24

Cleanliness confidence if other users are cooperative in cleaning

-.085

.053

-.045

−1.601

.11

Group dynamics factor

Cleaning team

.057

.038

.063

1.508

.13

  1. Step 1: Regression of cleaning behaviour on RANAS variables, N = 417, R Square = .75. Step 2: Regression of cleaning behaviour on RANAS and Social dilemma variables, N = 415, R Square = .77.