Skip to main content

Table 3 Participants response towards the mode of communication

From: Perceptions of HIV infected patients on the use of cell phone as a tool to support their antiretroviral adherence; a cross-sectional study in a large referral hospital in Kenya

Characters

All (%)

Male (%)

Female (%)

Support the idea (n = 499)

Yes

495 (99.2)

190 (99.0)

305 (99.3)

No

4 (0.8)

2 (1.0)

2 (0.7)

Information type (n = 495)

Drugs reminder

28 (3.0)

10 (2.7)

18 (3.2)

Communicate side effects

266 (28.4)

106 (28.9)

160 (28.1)

Medical advice

434 (46.4)

171 (46.6)

263 (46.2)

Inquire appointments

183 (19.6)

70 (19.1)

113 (19.9)

Gets healthcare provider’s updates

25 (2.7)

10 (2.7)

15 (2.6)

Whose phone (n = 499)

Own phone

496 (99.4)

192 (99.5)

304 (99.3)

New phone

2 (0.4)

0 (0.0)

2 (0.7)

None

1 (0.2)

1 (0.5)

0 (0.0)

Communication mode (n = 498)

Calling the hospital

359 (72.1)

130 (67.7)

229 (74.8)

Sending SMS to hospital

9 (1.8)

4 (2.1)

5 (1.6)

Calling & texting the hospital

129 (25.9)

58 (30.2)

71 (23.2)

Being called or texted by the hospital

1 (0.2)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.3)

Phone affordability (n = 499)

Yes

261 (52.3)

111 (57.5)

150 (49.0)

No

229 (45.9)

82 (42.5)

147 (48.0)

Don’t know

9 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

9 (1.8)

Anticipation of a problem (n = 500)

Yes

167 (33.4)

66 (34.2)

101 (32.9)

No

333 (66.6)

127 (65.8)

206 (67.1)

Anticipated problems

Affect confidentiality

31 (19.5)

10 (16.7)

21 (21.2)

Network problems

53 (33.3)

26 (43.3)

27 (27.3)

Language problem

52 (32.7)

20 (33.3)

32 (32.3)

Un-cooperative healthcare provider

23 (14.5)

4 (6.7)

19 (19.2)