Source | Dimensions of environmental construct (number of items) | Internal consistency | Test-retest reliability | Inter-rater reliability | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  | Results | MQS | Interval [days] | Results | MQS | Results |
Dunton et al. [37] | availability of community exercise facilities (26) | not assessed | Â | Â | not assessed | 29 | n.s. |
Durant et al. [38] | 1. environmental barriers to PA in local parks (5) | α = 0.71 - 0.81 | 38 | 27 | ICC = 0.48 - 0.58 |  | not assessed |
2. safety barriers to PA in local parks (6) | α = 0.64 - 0.70 | ICC = 0.57 - 0.76 |  | ||||
3. environmental barriers to PA in neighbourhood streets (5) | α = 0.80 - 0.87 | ICC = 0.49 - 0.61 |  | ||||
4. safety barriers to PA in neighbourhood streets (5) | α = 0.67 - 0.76 | ICC = 0.63 - 0.67 |  | ||||
Dwyer et al. [45] | perception of neighbourhood (8) | not assessed | 33 | 7-14 | Κ = 0.60 - 0.90 |  | not assessed |
Erwin [39] | 1. neighbourhood environment (9) | not assessed | 70 | 7-10 | ICC = 0.86 |  | not assessed |
2. convenient facilities (11) | ICC = 0.86 |  | |||||
Evenson et al. [40] | 1. safety (8) | not assessed | 70 | 6-24 (M = 12) | Κ = 0.37 - 0.52 |  | not assessed |
2. aesthetics (4) | Κ = 0.31 - 0.39 |  | |||||
3. facilities near the home (31) | ICC: 0.78 | Â | |||||
Forman et al. [41] | 1. environmental barriers for walking and cycling to parks (17) | α = 0.70 - 0.84 | 50 | 27 | ICC = 0.60 - 0.74 |  | ICC = 0.69 - 0.73 |
2. environmental barriers for walking and cycling to shops (17) | α = 0.70 - 0.85 | ICC = 0.56 - 0.75 | 29 | ICC = 0.46 - 0.68 | |||
3. environmental barriers for walking and cycling to school (17) | α = 0.70 - 0.86 | ICC = 0.60 - 0.81 |  | ICC = 0.73 - 0.78 | |||
Huang et al. [46] | 1. safety (5) | α = 0.71 | 70 | 10 | ICC = 0.89 |  | not assessed |
2. sports facilities (5) | not assessed | Κ = 0.58 - 0.70 |  | ||||
Hume et al. [44] | 1. physical environment (15) | not assessed | 60 | up to 9 | ICC = 0.84 |  | not assessed |
2. aesthetics (9) | α = 0.43 | ICC = 0.72 |  | ||||
3. safety (5) | α = 0.65 | ICC = 0.88 |  | ||||
McMinn et al. [35] | local environment (8) | α = 0.52 - 0.62 |  |  | not assessed |  | not assessed |
Norman et al. [42] | environment (4) | α = 0.24 - 0.67 | 63 | 7 | ICC = 0.60 - 0.64 |  | not assessed |
Ommundsen et al. [43] | 1. opportunity (3) | α = 0.44 |  |  | not assessed |  | not assessed |
2. facility (2) | r = 0.20 |  |  |  | |||
Pirasteh et al. [47] | environment (4) | α = 0.67 | 38 | 15 | r = 0.38 |  | not assessed |
Rosenberg et al. [36] | 1. land use mix-diversity (20) | α = 0.87 - 0.93 | 50 | 27 | ICC = 0.77 - 0.87 | 29 | ICC = 0.77 |
2. pedestrian and automobile traffic safety (7) | α = 0.79 - 0.85 | ICC = 0.66 - 0.74 | ICC = 0.52 | ||||
3. crime safety (6) | α = 0.87 - 0.93 | ICC = 0.73 - 0.87 | ICC = 0.53 | ||||
4. neighbourhood aesthetics (3) | α = 0.75 - 0.86 | ICC = 0.60 - 0.75 | ICC = 0.44 | ||||
5. walking/ cycling facilities (3) | α = 0.79 - 0.89 | ICC = 0.66 - 0.79 | ICC = 0.59 | ||||
6. street connectivity (3) | α = 0.72 - 0.75 | ICC = 0.56 - 0.61 | ICC = 0.47 | ||||
7. land use mix-access (6) | α = 0.72 - 0.84 | ICC = 0.56 - 0.73 | ICC = 0.57 | ||||
8. residential density (4) | α = 0.77 - 0.90 | ICC = 0.62 - 0.82 | ICC = 0.58 | ||||
 | 9. recreation facilities (14) | α = 0.80 - 0.84 |  |  | ICC = 0.67 - 0.73 |  | ICC = 0.55 |