Skip to main content

Table 1 List of variables, measuring instruments and data sources

From: The effectiveness of text messages support for diabetes self-management: protocol of the TEXT4DSM study in the democratic Republic of Congo, Cambodia and the Philippines

 

Variable

Instrument

Data collection method

Health outcome indicators

  
 

HbA1C

DCA Vantage (Siemens)

Blood samples taken by trained field researchers, analysed by laboratory staff at location. Results on a patient record form

 

Blood pressure

Electronic sphygmomanometer from certified manufacturer, study Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

By trained field researchers, on patient record form

 

BMI

Height and weight measured by research staff, study SOP

By trained field researchers, on patient record form

 

Waist/Hip ratio

Conventional measuring tape according to study-SOP

By trained field researchers, on patient record form

 

Diabetic foot lesions (nr)

Number of active wounds on both feet, detected through systematic examination by trained research staff

By trained field researchers, on patient record form

Access to care indicators

  
 

Attendance of DSME and medical care

Self-report over 12-month period: number of educator-contacts (check DSME patient records), visits to medical doctor, kidney-function test

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q28, 30, 31)

 

Total medical expenditure

Self-report

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q32 a+b)

 

Total time for h care visits

Self-report

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers ( Q32c+d)

Quality of support indicators

  
 

Perceived Quality of Care DSME

PACIC score (Glasgow et al. [33])

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q33a-t)

 

DSME needs and services

6-elements questionnaire, inspired by Diabetes Care Profile [34]

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q34+35)

 

Enablement through DSME

Patient enablement score [35]

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q36)

Empowerment indicators

  
 

Level of knowledge on diabetes (care)

Diabetes Knowledge Score, adapted from Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test & the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire ([36, 37])

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q13)

 

Attitude towards diabetes

Attitude scale Diabetes Care Profile [34]

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q14)

 

Feeling of control

Control scale from Diabetes Care Profile [34]

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q15a-d)

Self-management behaviour

  
 

Adherence to glucose monitoring & control

Self-report of last time self-monitoring, professional monitoring, medication taking

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q16-25)

 

Adherence to exercise & diet

Self-report

Interviews with paper questionnaire, by researchers (Q38/37, 41)

Process indicators

  
 

Number of SMS sent (ProjIC) to participant

Database that is used to send out ProjIC

Assessment by the project manager

 

Number and type (call or SMS) of PatIC to educators

Telephone provider records

Assessment by the project manager

 

intervention cost at DSMS programme level

Extraction from data from project documents

Collected by country research team

Context characteristics

  

Diabetes prevalence, phone penetration, literacy rate, DSME programme characteristics

extraction from data from project documents, country-related publications and other secondary data

Collected by country research team

 
 

Knowledge and professional habits of diabetes care providers

Provider Profile, Diabetes Management Practices and Brief Diabetes Knowledge & Practice Test (adapted from ([38])

Written self-administered questionnaire to health providers