Skip to main content

Table 2 Questionnaire responses of 1,447 respondents

From: Determinants and protective behaviours regarding tick bites among school children in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study

Question (determinant)

Abbreviated question

Correct answer/yes/*

Incorrect answer/no/*

Don’t know/*

No response (n)

1

Previously educated on ticks at school

21,4%

78,2%

n.a.

0,4% (6)

2 (K)

How to recognise an unfed tick (Image: tick shape or ant shape)

86,7%

6,6%

6,4%

0,2% (3)

3 (K)

Unfed tick size estimation (Image: 1 mm dot or 10 mm dot)

82,2%

9,3%

7,5%

1,0% (14)

4 (K)

Tick habitat (Image: forest or paved playground)

98,1%

0,7%

0,7%

0,6% (8)

5 (K;PV)

Consequence of tick bite (disease or itch)

93,5%

4,1%

2,4%

0,1% (1)

6 (K)

Where ticks reside (near ground or up in trees)

64,2%

29,1%

6,6%

0,1% (1)

7 (K)

How to prevent tick bite (tick check or washing)

86,1%

8,5%

5,3%

0,1% (2)

8 (K)

Main bite sites on the body (image: hairline, armpits, groin and knees; or mouth, chest, fingers and toes)

75,2%

16,9%

7,7%

0,2% (3)

9 (PS)

Perceived susceptibility for LB (can you personally get ill after tick-bite?)

68,6%

16,7%

14,4%

0,3% (4)

10 (PI)

Importance of tick check (not, somewhat, or very important)

*7,0%

*52,5%

*40,4%

0,2% (3)

11 (PSK)

Perceived susceptibility (knowing persons with illness after tick bite)

26,7%

66,6%

6,4%

0,3% (4)

12 (PB)

Checked for tick bites to date? (never, occasionally, every time)

*30,1%

*51,8%

*17,9%

0,2% (3)

  1. Behavioural determinants are given where relevant by abbreviations: K knowledge; PV perceived severity; PS perceived susceptibility; PSK perceived susceptibility due to knowing persons with LB; PI perceived importance, and PB protective behaviour.
  2. *See abbreviated question for answer category.