From: Thailand’s HIV/AIDS program after weaning-off the global fund’s support
Principal recipients | Capacity to survive after weaning-off | Possible impacts, immediate responses | Coping strategies |
---|---|---|---|
KI 01–03, PR | High, since GF sources play minor role, it has high capacity to mobilize resources | ● Staff cut, though unknown future funding for IDU and migrants | 1. Merge GF program with existing governance body, mobilize local government budget |
2. Transfer ARV finance to National Health Security Office | |||
3. Mobilize other international funders | |||
KI04, PR | Low | ● Severe impact on IDU and ART for non-Thai migrants | 1. Scale down GF programme |
2. Negotiate with GPO supporting ARV for non-Thai migrants | |||
● Local staff cut, scale down or termination of some projects. | |||
KI05, PR | Very low | ● Termination of HIV prevention services for IDU | 1. Change target KAP to other group that conform to Thai government regulations in order to be eligible to receive funding from other international sources |
● HIV incidence/prevalence among IDU may increase sharply | |||
2. Scale down and prioritize the most affected areas | |||
KI06, PR | Low | ● Abrupt termination of current program | 1. A national focal point is essential to manage the new national pooled fund from domestic sources; requiring legislation or regulations |
● Interim: use of savings/or remaining budget | |||
● May be eligible for a 'ceiling budget’ from a single stream funding Round 10 targeting children | 2. Others: public private partnership on HIV/AIDS |