This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Musculoskeletal comorbidities in cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease: the impact on activity limitations; a representative population-based study
© Slater et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 24 September 2010
Accepted: 3 February 2011
Published: 3 February 2011
The purpose of this study was to quantify the contribution of comorbidity to activity limitations in populations with chronic cardiovascular disease, diabetes or respiratory disease (index conditions), with emphasis on musculoskeletal comorbidity (arthritis or back problems).
Analysis of the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey 3.1 (age 20+ years, n = 115,915). Prevalence ratios for activity limitations in people with the index conditions and co-occurring musculoskeletal disease, adjusted for age, gender, and socioeconomic factors, were used to estimate population associated fractions (PAF).
Comorbid arthritis and back problems significantly increased the risk of activity limitations across all index conditions with prevalence ratios of 1.60 and 1.46 for cardiovascular disease, 1.51 and 1.36 for diabetes, and 1.38 and 1.44 for respiratory disease for arthritis and back problems respectively. Arthritis and back problems accounted for at least 13% and 9% of activity limitations in the index populations.
While chronic musculoskeletal conditions are not always considered priorities in chronic disease prevention, they account for a substantial proportion of activity restrictions seen in people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease, with implications for prevention and control strategies.
People are living longer with chronic diseases and sedentary lifestyles and an abundance of high calorie food put people at further risk of a range of chronic conditions including heart disease, diabetes and arthritis [1, 2]. The increasing burden of chronic diseases on current and future use of the health care system in industrialized countries is driving the adoption of chronic disease prevention and control strategies. A component of these strategies is helping individuals acquire the skills to manage their health and maintain an active life. A frequent focus of attention for chronic disease prevention and management programs has been on cancer, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and chronic respiratory disease with many programs focusing on a single disease. However, many people have comorbidities (i.e. multiply co-occurring diseases) . The occurrence of comorbidity influences decisions in many areas of health including prevention, complexity of treatment and service utilization, as well as influencing outcomes such as limitations in activity, participation restriction and mortality [5, 6]. In spite of this, little attention has been paid to comorbidity and the effect that comorbid conditions have on limitations in activity and hence on one's ability to engage in self management behaviours, in particular physical activity[7, 8].
Thus, the goal of this study is to quantify the contribution of comorbidity to activity limitations in people with existing chronic cardiovascular disease, diabetes or respiratory disease, with particular emphasis on musculoskeletal comorbidity, specifically arthritis and back problems, as these conditions are a frequent comorbidity [9, 10] and the most frequent cause of activity limitations in the population[11, 12]. Cancer was not included due to its low reported prevalence.
Data were obtained from the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS, Cycle 3.1), a comprehensive cross-sectional survey of health status and determinants administered by Statistics Canada, Canada's central statistical agency. The target population included individuals 12 years of age and older living in private dwellings excluding individuals living on Indian Reserves or in certain remote areas, institutional residents and members of the Armed Forces. The survey covered approximately 98% of the Canadian population aged 12 and older.
A two-stage cluster design was employed to arrive at a representative sample of the household population. In the first stage, homogeneous strata were formed and independent samples of clusters were drawn from each stratum. In the second stage, dwelling lists were prepared for each cluster and dwellings, or households, were selected from the lists.
More specifically, each of the 10 provinces was divided into three types of regions: major urban centres, cities, and rural regions. Geographic or socio-economic strata were created within each major urban centre. Within the strata, dwellings were regrouped to create clusters.
In each stratum, six clusters were chosen by a random sampling method with a probability proportional to size, the size of which corresponded to the number of households. The other cities and rural regions of each province were stratified first on a geographical basis, then according to socio-economic characteristics. Once the new clusters were listed, the sample was obtained using a systematic sampling of dwellings. Further details of survey methodology, including strategies to ensure representativeness of the sample, have been published .
The questionnaire was administered using computer-assisted personal interviews (83% of the sample) and telephone interviews. With 132,221 participants, household and person response rates were high (84.9% and 92.9% respectively). For this study, analyses are focused on the adult population aged 20+ years (n = 115,915). The data used in this study were publicly available.
The presence of chronic conditions was determined using the lead-in statement: "We are interested in long-term conditions that have lasted or are expected to last six months or longer and that have been diagnosed by a health professional. Do you have...". Of the 27 specific self-reported chronic conditions that are collected by the CCHS, this study considered the following chronic conditions: cardiovascular conditions (indentified as the self-reported presence of "high blood pressure", "heart disease" or "suffer from the effects of a stroke"), "diabetes", respiratory conditions (identified as the self-reported presence of "asthma", "chronic bronchitis", "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease" or "emphysema"), "arthritis or rheumatism, excluding fibromyalgia" (referred to as arthritis), and "back problems, excluding fibromyalgia and arthritis" (referred to as back problems). All other chronic conditions were grouped together.
The health outcome of interest for this study was a global measure of activity limitation.
Prefaced with "The next few questions deal with any current limitations in your daily activities caused by a long-term health condition or problem," respondents were asked, "Do you have any difficulty...walking, climbing stairs, bending, learning or doing any similar activities?" and "Does a long-term physical condition or mental condition or health problem, reduce the amount or the kind of activity you can do...at home?...at school?...at work?...in other activities, for example, transportation or leisure?" For each of these, respondents indicated either "sometimes", "often", "never." Respondents were categorised as having an activity limitation if they responded as sometimes or often having any difficulty.
Age was grouped in 10 year intervals commencing at 20-29 to age 80+. Age over 80 years could not be further broken down as it was available in grouped format only. Race was categorised as white or visible minority. The Asian population is the largest visible minority group in Canada; only a small proportion of the population identified themselves as black or Latin American (1.7% and 0.7%, respectively). The highest level of education was dichotomized as more than high school or high school or less. Total household income was grouped as >$15,000, $15,000-$29,999, $30,000-$49,999, $50,000-%79,000, and >$80,000. Body Mass Index (BMI = weight [kg]/height [meters]2) was calculated using participant-reported height and weight, excluding pregnant women. BMI was considered as: underweight, (<18.5 kg/m2) normal weight (18.5-<24.9 kg/m2), and overweight/obese (≥25 kg/m2).
Data weights, provided by Statistics Canada to account for sample design, non-response and post-stratification, were used to provide estimates representative of the household population aged 20+ years. The methods employed by Statistics Canada to calculate weights have been published . Variances were calculated using rescaled weights and incorporated design factors provided by Statistics Canada.
Descriptive analyses examined the distribution of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and BMI in the overall population, and within each group reporting cardiovascular conditions, diabetes and respiratory conditions (the index conditions). Additionally, the prevalence of index and comorbid conditions, proportion with activity limitation, prevalence of comorbid conditions among the index groups, and proportion with activity limitations among pair of index and comorbid conditions were examined.
Three sets of analyses were carried out for populations defined by the presence of one of the specific chronic conditions of interest: cardiovascular conditions, diabetes or respiratory disease (index conditions). Following the methodology used in Perruccio et al, adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for activity limitation were estimated through multivariate log-Poisson regression analyses with robust variance estimation [15, 16]. The log-Poisson regression included age, gender education, income, race, BMI, and chronic conditions as indicated above. Population-associated fractions (PAF) for activity limitations were calculated for each pair of index and comorbid conditions. SAS 9.1 was used for all statistical analyses.
Population characteristics, overall and by index condition group.
(n = 115,915)
(n = 29,281)
(n = 8,100)
(n = 13,206)
High school or less
More than high school
Prevalence of index and comorbid conditions, proportion with activity limitation, and population-associated fractions† (%) for activity limitation for index-comorbid condition pairs.
Other chronic conditions
Prevalence of condition (%)
Proportion with activity limitation (%)
Comorbid chronic conditions
Proportion who have comorbid condition (%)
Proportion with index and comorbid condition with activity limitation (%)
Population Associated Fraction† (%)
Prevalence ratios (95% CI) for activity limitation from log-Poisson regression analyses by index condition.
(n = 29,281)
(n = 8,100)
(n = 13,206)
1.60 (1.53 - 1.67)
1.51 (1.40 - 1.62)
1.38 (1.30 - 1.47)
1.46 (1.41 - 1.52)
1.36 (1.28 - 1.45)
1.44 (1.36 - 1.52)
1.24 (1.15 - 1.35)
1.09 (1.03 - 1.15)
1.15 (1.10 - 1.20)
1.00 (0.94 - 1.06)
1.25 (1.20 - 1.30)
1.17 (1.09 - 1.26)
Other chronic conditions
1.20 (1.12 - 1.29)
1.17 (0.97 - 1.41)
0.92 (0.83 - 1.02)
Age (years) (ref: 20-29)
0.79 (0.60 - 1.04)
1.79 (0.66 - 4.87)
1.11 (0.98 - 1.26)
1.01 (0.78 - 1.29)
2.11 (0.78 - 5.68)
1.32 (1.17 - 1.50)
0.97 (0.76 - 1.24)
2.04 (0.76 - 5.47)
1.42 (1.26 - 1.60)
0.98 (0.77 - 1.25)
2.17 (0.81 - 5.83)
1.47 (1.31 - 1.65)
1.12 (0.88 - 1.43)
2.31 (0.86 - 6.20)
1.55 (1.37 - 1.74)
1.42 (1.11 - 1.81)
2.88 (1.07 - 7.73)
1.88 (1.67 - 2.12)
Gender (ref: male)
0.93 (0.89 - 0.97)
0.98 (0.92 - 1.05)
1.00 (0.95 - 1.06)
Race (ref: white)
0.85 (0.78 - 0.93)
0.88 (0.77 - 1.01)
0.94 (0.84 - 1.05)
Education (ref: more than high school)
High school or less
0.97 (0.93 - 1.01)
0.99 (0.92 - 1.05)
0.98 (0.93 - 1.04)
Income (ref: >$80,000)
1.33 (1.23 - 1.44)
1.26 (1.09 - 1.46)
1.42 (1.29 - 1.56)
1.23 (1.14 - 1.33)
1.21 (1.05 - 1.39)
1.30 (1.18 - 1.42)
1.18 (1.09 - 1.27)
1.14 (0.99 - 1.31)
1.19 (1.08 - 1.31)
1.12 (1.03 - 1.21)
0.98 (0.98 - 1.14)
1.12 (1.02 - 1.23)
BMI (ref: normal weight)
1.23 (1.05 - 1.43)
1.25 (0.96 - 1.63)
1.27 (1.07 - 1.50)
1.09 (1.04 - 1.13)
1.12 (1.02 - 1.22)
1.19 (1.12 - 1.27)
Prevalence ratios were used to calculate population-associated fractions within each of the index condition populations for pairs of comorbid conditions (Table 2). For all three index conditions, PAFs were highest for arthritis as a comorbid condition, followed by back problems.
When arthritis and back problems were combined (results not shown), the same pattern emerged; co-existing musculoskeletal conditions increased the risk of activity limitation by at least 80%: PR 2.12, 95% CI: 2.00, 2.25 in those with cardiovascular disease; PR 1.81, 95% CI 1.66, 1.96 in those with diabetes; PR 1.86, 95% CI 1.70, 2.03 in those with respiratory disease. Co-occurring musculoskeletal disease accounted for roughly 30% of all activity limitations in people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease.
While research has examined the impact of chronic conditions on an individual's ability to perform daily activities related to independent living,[12, 17–20] this study contributes to knowledge by estimating the contribution of comorbid disease to increasing the risk of activity limitations specifically in people with existing cardiovascular disease, diabetes or respiratory disease. We found that among people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease, comorbid musculoskeletal conditions (arthritis and back problems) both increased the risk and accounted for a substantial proportion of activity limitations. Comorbid cardiovascular disease also contributed a substantial proportion to activity limitations in those with diabetes.
The population associated fractions calculated in this study for populations with specific chronic diseases are generally higher that those found in an earlier study for the total population which also used activity limitations as an outcome. Perruccio et al showed PAFs ranging from 3.7% to 7.5% for the contribution of diabetes and individual cardiovascular and respiratory conditions to activity limitations in the general population, adjusted for a range of comorbidities. Corresponding values for arthritis and back problems were 16.8% and 4.3% respectively. Griffith et al.  reported relatively large population attributable risks for functional disability (examining independently activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living) for pairs of chronic conditions which included arthritis. They report some of the highest values for the combination of arthritis and heart problems. Their study was limited to individuals aged 65 and over, however. These differences suggest there are differential impacts for individuals with specific medical conditions depending on the presence of particular comorbidities, and the age structure of the population under study. An important advantage of the present study was the consideration of conditions of high prevalence in the population or of considerable public interest, or both, across the full adult age range. The differential impacts we report may need to be taken into account in setting priorities for public health interventions.
Older age, lower income, and increased weight (overweight/obese) were found to be significantly associated with activity limitations in people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease. This was expected as these are common risk factors for these chronic diseases[22, 23] and for comorbidity as well as for activity limitations and disability in general[25–27].
Arthritis, back problems, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory diseases can all interfere with physical functioning and activity levels[14, 19, 28]. For example, those with arthritis are not as physically active as persons without arthritis, likely partly attributable to the pain, stiffness, and joint destruction associated with the disease. Studies in the US population have shown that arthritis is a barrier to physical activity such that individuals with either diabetes or heart disease who also have arthritis were more likely to be physically inactive than those with just one of these conditions[30, 31]. Activity limitations can be thought of as a global measure of disability and the general definition used in the CCHS captures restrictions in numerous activities including physical function (walking, climbing stairs, etc) as well as activities at home, work, school, and leisure. This definition reflects physical performance and ability to carry out a range of activities with implications for physical activity.
Our study is not without limitations as health surveys based on self-reported data have obvious disadvantages. The absence of clinician-assessed chronic conditions may lead to inaccuracies in the prevalence of chronic disease. Nonetheless, such surveys are generally considered to be a reliable, economic, and practical means for measuring morbidity[33–35]. Our measure of activity limitations was a global measure and does not exclusively address physical activity as such, although this is included in the measure. As the cross-sectional nature of the data prohibits us from drawing any causal inferences, future work should build upon these findings and assess the longitudinal relationship between comorbidity and activity limitations. However, regardless of the timing of the development of the chronic conditions and outcome, the implications of musculoskeletal comorbidity on health outcomes are significant. Finally, we only considered pairs of chronic conditions and their relationship with activity limitations. Approximately one quarter of the study population reported having three or more chronic conditions and the impact of this should be investigated. Further work should also consider the impact of mental health conditions on these associations as psychological distress has been shown to add to the negative impact of chronic conditions on limitations in everyday activities[36–38].
Although numerous chronic disease prevention strategies and practice guidelines have been developed, they mainly address single chronic conditions and ignore the presence of co-existing conditions. Our findings suggest that the implementation of effective prevention, treatment and management strategies for chronic disease might be affected by musculoskeletal comorbidity. While musculoskeletal conditions are not always considered to be among the top priorities in chronic disease prevention, they are the most prevalent chronic conditions. This population-based study points to the importance of taking into account the impact of arthritis and back problems on activity limitations in persons with co-existing cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease when designing intervention and prevention strategies.
There can be potential synergies and antagonisms in populations with comorbid conditions and potential problems in delivering intervention and prevention strategies. However, approaches which consider the presence and impact of comorbid conditions are likely of greater benefit to the population and patient than approaches which overlook them. For example, physical activity is a key prevention strategy particularly for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, and for health in general. When designing intervention strategies, it needs to be recognized that comorbid arthritis and back problems is not a contraindication, although modifications may need to be made . Further, regular physical activity has been shown to be beneficial in managing symptoms associated with arthritis and back problems.
The adoption of chronic disease prevention and control strategies is becoming more critical as the burden of chronic diseases in industrialized countries continues to increase. A component of these strategies encourages individuals to manage their health and maintain an active life. To date, many of these strategies have focused on single diseases. Less attention has been paid to comorbidity and the effect that comorbid conditions have on activity and consequently on one's ability to engage in self-management practices, in particular physical activity.
Among people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and respiratory disease, comorbid musculoskeletal conditions both increased the risk and accounted for a substantial proportion of activity limitations. This suggests the implementation of effective prevention, treatment and management strategies for these chronic diseases might be affected by musculoskeletal comorbidity. While musculoskeletal conditions are not always considered to be among the top priorities in chronic disease prevention, they are the most prevalent chronic conditions. Musculoskeletal conditions and comorbidity need to be accounted for when designing intervention and prevention strategies.
This study was supported by a Health System Linked Research Unit Grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (Grant 04166). The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care is intended or should be inferred.
AV Perruccio was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship Award (SBM 90860). There was no involvement by the funding agency in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
- Anderson G, Horvath J: The growing burden of chronic disease in America. Public Health Rep. 2004, 119: 263-270. 10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Salihu HM, Bonnema SM, Alio AP: Obesity: What is an elderly population growing into?. Maturitas. 2009, 63: 7-12. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.02.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adams SG, Smith PK, Allan PF, Anzueto A, Pugh JA, Cornell JE: Systematic review of the chronic care model in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevention and management. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167: 551-561. 10.1001/archinte.167.6.551.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, Gibson TB, Marder WD, Weiss KB, Blumenthal D: Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med. 2007, 22 (Suppl 3): 391-395. 10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fortin M, Soubhi H, Hudon C, Bayliss EA, van den AM: Multimorbidity's many challenges. BMJ. 2007, 334: 1016-1017. 10.1136/bmj.39201.463819.2C.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, Ruwaard D, Satariano WA, van den Bos GA: Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54: 661-674. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00363-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caughey GE, Vitry AI, Gilbert AL, Roughead EE: Prevalence of comorbidity of chronic diseases in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 221-10.1186/1471-2458-8-221.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fried LP, Guralnik JM: Disability in older adults: evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997, 45: 92-100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schellevis FG, van d V, van de LE, van Eijk JT, van Weel C: Comorbidity of chronic diseases in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993, 46: 469-473. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90024-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siebens HC: Musculoskeletal problems as comorbidities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007, 86: S69-S78. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31802ba581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation--United States, 2003-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006, 55: 1089-1092.Google Scholar
- Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK: Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol. 1994, 21: 505-514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) Cycle 3.1(2005) Public Use Microdata Files User Guide.Google Scholar
- Perruccio AV, Power JD, Badley EM: The relative impact of 13 chronic conditions across three different outcomes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007, 61: 1056-1061. 10.1136/jech.2006.047308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zou G: A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004, 159: 702-706. 10.1093/aje/kwh090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barros AJ, Hirakata VN: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003, 3: 21-10.1186/1471-2288-3-21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lawton MP, Brody EM: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969, 9: 179-186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB: The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health. 1994, 84: 351-358. 10.2105/AJPH.84.3.351.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Verbrugge LM, Patrick DL: Seven chronic conditions: their impact on US adults' activity levels and use of medical services. Am J Public Health. 1995, 85: 173-182. 10.2105/AJPH.85.2.173.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Picavet HS, van den Bos GA: The contribution of six chronic conditions to the total burden of mobility disability in the Dutch population. Am J Public Health. 1997, 87: 1680-1682. 10.2105/AJPH.87.10.1680.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Griffith L, Raina P, Wu H, Zhu B, Stathokostas L: Population attributable risk for functional disability associated with chronic conditions in Canadian older adults. Age Ageing. 2010, 39: 738-745. 10.1093/ageing/afq105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manuel DG, Schultz SE: Diabetes Health Status and Risk Factors. Diabetes in Ontario: An ICES Practice Atlas. Edited by: Hux J, Booth G, Slaughter P, Laupacis A. 2003, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 4: 77-4. 94Google Scholar
- Tanuseputro P, Manuel DG, Leung M, Nguyen K, Johansen H: Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Canada. CCORT Canadian Cardiovascular Atlas. Edited by: Tu JV, Ghali WA, Pilote L, Brien S. 2006, Pulsus Group Inc and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 30-40.Google Scholar
- Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH: The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 88-10.1186/1471-2458-9-88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ells LJ, Lang R, Shield JP, Wilkinson JR, Lidstone JS, Coulton S, Summerbell CD: Obesity and disabil. Obes Rev. 2006, 7: 341-345. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00233.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liou TH, Pi-Sunyer FX, Laferrere B: Physical disability and obesity. Nutr Rev. 2005, 63: 321-331. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00110.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: A socio-demographic profile of Canadians experiencing health or activity limitations. Ottawa. 1992Google Scholar
- Verbrugge LM, Juarez L: Arthritis disability and heart disease disability. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 59: 1445-1457. 10.1002/art.24107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hootman JM, Macera CA, Ham SA, Helmick CG, Sniezek JE: Physical activity levels among the general US adult population and in adults with and without arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003, 49: 129-135. 10.1002/art.10911.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with heart disease--United States, 2005 and 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009, 58: 165-169.Google Scholar
- Arthritis as a potential barrier to physical activity among adults with diabetes--United States, 2005 and 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008, 57: 486-489.Google Scholar
- McDougall J, Miller LT: Measuring chronic health condition and disability as distinct concepts in national surveys of school-aged children in Canada: a comprehensive review with recommendations based on the ICD-10 and ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2003, 25: 922-939. 10.1080/0963828031000122249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heliovaara M, Aromaa A, Klaukka T, Knekt P, Joukamaa M, Impivaara O: Reliability and validity of interview data on chronic diseases. The Mini-Finland Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993, 46: 181-191. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90056-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beckett M, Weinstein M, Goldman N, Yu-Hsuan L: Do health interview surveys yield reliable data on chronic illness among older respondents?. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 151: 315-323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I: Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records of chronic diseases in middle-aged and elderly Finnish men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 1997, 145: 762-769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein MB, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, Belik SL, Sareen J: Does co-morbid depressive illness magnify the impact of chronic physical illness? A population-based perspective. Psychol Med. 2006, 36: 587-596. 10.1017/S0033291706007239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill CL, Gill T, Taylor AW, Daly A, Grande ED, Adams RJ: Psychological factors and quality of life in arthritis: a population-based study. Clin Rheumatol. 2007, 26: 1049-1054. 10.1007/s10067-006-0439-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ford DE: Optimizing outcomes for patients with depression and chronic medical illnesses. Am J Med. 2008, 121: S38-S44. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marzolini S, Candelaria H, Oh P: Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal comorbidities in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010, 30: 391-400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dziedzic K, Jordan JL, Foster NE: Land- and water-based exercise therapies for musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 22: 407-418. 10.1016/j.berh.2007.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2458/11/77/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.