Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Armando Soto-Rojas |
| 23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luc Martens |
| 9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Constantine Oulis |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Armando Soto-Rojas |
| 3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luc Martens |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Constantine Oulis |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Constantine Oulis |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-100 |
You can find further information about peer review here.